![]() ![]() Anything else feature wise doesn’t make any sense to me for why I spent my money here. Then, keep going, making those core features better and more awesome. Please continue work on the core reason most of us bought the software, to blow up photos and add fine detail that wasn’t there. All versions of the software back through Gigapixel, without exception, give, and then take away, the thrill of what could be. You gave me a small taste of what could be in “parts” of some of my photos, but then that gift gets taken away in other parts of the same photos, all photos, without exception. I just want to blow up beautiful photos with more detail. As I said before in another comment, I don’t need Photo AI to be Photoshop, or Capture One, Lightroom, etc. I would love to have a normal sharpening ability, like a tiny radius setting like PS has so I can finely adjust the thickness of the sharp edges, such that blown up blades of grass don’t look like green twigs, etc., the way it is now. I’ve shut off everything I can find, and there’s still auto pilot stuff going on. And I would have a complete turn off feature for anything auto pilot, which I thought V2 was supposed to have, but does not near as I can tell. I would love to have presets I can make and save that are specific for me and not tied to auto pilot in any way. I would love to have a working, professional quality level of batch processing with nuanced controls and that can handle thousands, or at least hundreds of old photos accurately and without crashing. I would like to not have to add blur to already sharp photos to have the software decide it can only add the models for grass, leaves, rocks, etc., after I add blur. It does not have a logical flow, at least not for me. I don’t have that problem in any other photo editing software. I’ve dinked around with PAI for countless hours and I still am not certain at times what slider is doing what in conjunction with the other sliders. Less baffling controls/tools that often don’t make sense in the context they are portrayed as, nor when you try to mix them.įor instance, the new sharpen V 2, the more I turn it up, the more PAI V2 hallucinates new strange and wrong sized leaves/grass/moss? I thought it was a sharpen tool, not an add more leaf, etc., models tool. Also, not have the rock area itself look like large clumps of clay stuck together. I would love to have boulders that blow up with the fine grain of boulders and not have the green/yellow, etc., moss on the boulder turned to big leaves. Also, a much nicer/detailed and realistic blow up of water, or water falls. I would love to have the software much better trained to understand in the first place, what a rock is, or tree/log, water, etc, and where one ends and another begins. No giant square hunks of complete blurry areas right next to perfectly sharp areas, despite no depth changes. In other words, no hallucinated weird leaves and wrong sized leaves/needles/grass/moss, and so on.Īlso, no furry rocks, furry water, furry pine needles and so on. ( Btw, I do landscape nature work, not facial enlargements, so I won’t comment on face stuff.)īeing able to blow up photos even larger than 6 X and have those blow ups be true and accurate to the photos with lovely detail, as if I had shot whatever older image with a $10K lens let’s say. If I had a magic fairy wand and could make Photo AI V 2.0 into what I would have wanted, here it is.Īnd, I would love to throw money at the developers to have these core type features of my fairy wand wishes actually work at 100%. That will gen low res content that needs ‘cleaning’ & scaling. Both traditional Topaz creative ones & current functional ones.īTW, I believe this will become even more important if/when Ps releases to the masses some of the Firefly features they’ve been mass beta testing since earlier this year. With my entirely Ps workflow, I rely on high caliber Topaz (& other 3rd party) plugins to be efficient. But PAI is better than anything I’ve used in Ps to restore or sharpen up faces. I very infrequently ‘shoot’ group people shots & ditto post-pandemic, with increased street crime, street photographs that include smaller faces. Also (usually, but not for every image) I prefer the Topaz denoising to Ps’. I have no use for functionality that I have in LRc or PS, but based on the comments there are people who want them.ī/c the updated ‘Gigapixel’ features - as a plugin to Ps - are better than Ps’ scaling features. They are putting a lot of resources in raw and plugin functionality too. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |